SADIQ HUSSAIN versus HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION, BAHAWALPUR
Section 12 (2) was challenged by the House Building Finance Corporation Act (XVIII of 1952), section 30, and the judgment failed to pay the mortgage money on the basis of fraud and misrepresentation; the mortgage was with the House Building Finance Corporation. , The corporation filed an application under section 30 of the House. The Building Finance Corporation Act, 1952, which was ordered by the applicants, filed a petition stating that the decree was approved on the basis of misrepresentation and fraud. And that no mortgage was registered in the Revenue Record at the relevant time. Applicants failed to disclose fraudulent misrepresentation or nature by passing invalid decree while the Impact Registered Process found the theory correct. However, if the Revenue Record were not made in the Revenue Record, it will not be considered that the registered assignment deadline and its effectiveness will be given to the applicants who are buying the property, they have to be careful, cautious and record. Had to check. Prior to the purchase of the property, the registration office's decree against the property cannot be declared void or as a result of misrepresentation or fraud under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
