Find a Lawyer

SHAKEEL AHMAD versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE

Section 5, 7 (2) and Schedule [as amended by the Family Courts (Amendment) Act (VII of 1997]] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for the determination of territorial jurisdiction. A lawsuit was filed for The place \ L \ s husband resisted the suit on the ground that the wife's place of residence was \ G \, therefore, the L \ L suit was not appropriate at the place, but it was the wife's right to bring the case to local limits. The Family Court, where they generally lived, could not be determined by strict and stringent rules. The wife intended to reside in a particular place and the length of stay was neither Civil Procedure Code, 1908, nor the law applied to this testimony, 1984, which was a modest residence on matters which came under the jurisdiction of the Family Court. The Family Court had jurisdiction over the case. The wife filed a case for the recovery of the dowry articles like 2001 and yet she has not been able to decide her case / suit on the merit. Having been fighting for technicalities for years and the case was yet to be decided on merit, the High Court directed the Family Court that she be May decide on the pending case. Under the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n us immigration advocates from Warburton lawyer