Find a Lawyer

NOOR HASSAN versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) evidence was appreciated on the roof of the deceased's house in the middle of the night where he was sleeping on the couch, while his wife (the complainant) was on another bed with his daughter complaining. Were sleeping The other eyewitness testified that the trial improved faithfully, saying that the accused fired a minute or two into his view after the eyewitness ended up sleeping in his house. Had done See the suspect before the roof was set on fire. Police were not defined for a seven-hour delay in reporting the matter, leading to the logical conclusion that the prosecution's witnesses were unsure. Who killed the victim's deceased daughter? The best witness of the case was not presented to the trial court. The motive for the incident was not proven that the crime was not cleared by chance and the forensic scientist's laboratory was not sent to the licensed Firm, recovery against the accused. The evidence could not be used, the suspects were merely suspecting that after seven hours of deliberations, the case continued to demonstrate, which could not have been stronger. The accused in the evidence was acquitted under circumstances when you need a advocate from Multan lawyer