Find a Lawyer

HABIB SULTAN versus STATE

Section 302 (b) appreciating the evidence belonged to the eyewitnesses as well as to the accused, there was no question as to the accused's light, unidentified or misidentification of any witnesses. There was no serious enmity. As if to add it to a false case, the presence of witnesses at the scene of the incident at the time of the incident was normal and the calculation of the nature of the incident was permanent and it was fully supported by medical evidence. There were minor and unusual ones that naturally spread. When the matter was recorded after a long time, the location of the event was not challenged by the investigating officer. Lapis would not be sure that he could be persuaded and direct the complaint in the presence of evidence. Will not. It was inadmissible because the prosecution's case proved beyond doubt against the accused. He alleged that he had to stand aside from his proceedings and that the weakness or failure of the purpose would not have any adverse effect on the prosecution's case. , Nor will it be considered a mitigating circumstance, which was not supported by a defense plea based on wild allegations of frustration. Evidence suspect was a desperate criminal who killed three innocent persons There were no mitigating circumstances in favor of the accused and the death sentence of the accused was confirmed. advocates from Tarnol lawyer