Find a Lawyer

ASMAT ULLAH KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION

Sections 3, 5, 6, 7 and 10 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the appellant was dismissed from the job after issuing notices and conducting allegations of corruption and inquiries against them. Launched against the appellant and the appellant, who submitted their detailed defense response, said that after taking part in the inquiry, the appellant did not initially appear on a medical basis. The record did not appear at a later stage of the inquiry. The appellant had deliberately refused to participate. In such cases, it was not good for the appellant to convince him that the inquiry was conducted or that the procedure taken by the inquiry officer was in violation of the principles of natural justice. The inquiry officer did not conclude. It was The evidence of the alleged irregularities of each charge against the appellant against any established law of law or natural justice was strong enough to warrant the inquiry officer's disclosure that the allegations were substantiated by the issuance of a fresh charge sheet. Beginning of the entire disciplinary proceedings and disappearances. The dismissal orders were in accordance with the law and were not in violation of any principle of natural justice list of advocates from Hunza Nagar lawyer