Find a Lawyer

AZIZULLAH SHAIKH versus FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL HEADQUARTERS, ISLAMABAD

Appeals from Sections 3, 5 and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Sections 3A (2) (B) and 4 Service Tribunals withholding development for 3 years increased the penalty, appeal for lack of supervision The appellant was prosecuted and the appellate officer failed to perform his duties effectively, convicting the appellant of these charges, with the appellant's competent authority serving a three-year probation fine Recommended imposition, which retaliated against the appellant's unsatisfactory, issued notice of sentence. From Appellant to Appeal to Appeal to Minor Prevention to Fine-to-Service Compulsory Retirement Appeals, a member of the Service Tribunal with regard to the results set up by the competent authority has the authority to take a serious view and raise the issue. Justified The Tribunal, amended, said the tribunal's decision on the mandatory retirement major penalty was delayed by the first member's minor penalty stopping the development for three years. In view of the division, sent to the Chairman of the Federal Service Tribunal. The record did not show any direct interference of the appellant from the Chairman of the Federal Service Tribunal under Section 3 (2) (b) or the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, which amended the additional penalties for stopping the development for 3 years. Done. Through the second member of the Tribunal Chairman, the inquiry officer correctly observed that the appellant as a shift charge at the relevant time was merely negligence, lack of supervision and effective control of his subordinates. criminal advocate from Madinah lawyer