Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RASHEED MEMON versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD

An unknown complaint against Sections 3, 5 and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 3A (2) (B) and 4 Compulsory Retirement Appellant was prosecuted against the appellant in which fraud and dishonor. There were some accusations of regulation. The inquiry report against the appellant revealed that the allegations against the appellant were partially proved and that the appellant was removed from the job, a member of the service tribunal on appeal, removed from service. On the amendment order, Censor was fined a minor and directed that the appellant be reinstated. The date of approval of the impeachment order and the resultant gains from the other tribunal members sustained a substantial penalty of dismissal from the employment of the appellant, saying that the allegations leveled against them were against the inquiry committee. Have been proven by the. The appellant, however, with regard to Moody, did not deserve any service chairman of the service tribunal. The principal complainant did not record his statement before the inquiry committee, but the evidence that was brought to the record before the inquiry committee. Was not presented before the inquiry committee, but the applicant was fined or terminated from compulsory retirement service with any allowable benefits justified in law. It was really serious and serious for the committee to maintain the charges against the appellant against the appellant charges and the effect was to shake the public's trust in the department's scheme, when the inquiry committee must take retirement from the job. when you need a advocate from Chilas lawyer