Find a Lawyer

SAADULLAH versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR

The last male owner of the suit land to sue Su 42, and the defendant, who was the victim's brother's son, claimed that the defendant had sued the plaintiff for consideration in his lifetime. Sell, who was also the successor to the deceased's other brothers, disputed defendants' claim that the deceased had not sold the suit to the seller and the seller had not appeared to the tehsildar in dispute. The changing daily was filed in reference to the Wacketty report, and the tehsildar obtained it by identifying the vendor with a certified copy of the Lambarders. Was truthful. The journal was presented to the plaintiff by the plaintiff and was admitted without any objection to the seller's widow's evidence, while her husband / vendor fully supported the sale of the land sold in favor of her nephew, the defendant. Statement against his own interest. They will inherit the 1/4 th share of the property in respect of the suit land in favor of the defendant, but also stated that the defendant had interfered with the unlawful decisions and was on record under section 115. In light of the above evidence, my husband / vendor case also paid consideration, CPC was not out, said review against decisions and orders was dismissed. immigration advocates contact from Hayatabad lawyer