Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR SARGODHA versus MUHAMMAD ASGHAR THROUGH MUKHTAR KHAS

Sections 34 and 39 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 100 Second Appeal The second action in the proceedings separation of the preceding proceedings authorizing the arbitration clause proceeding, filed on 159 1994, and Demand for a written statement was postponed, which was approved. It was finally on 22 9 1995 that an application was filed under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, but it was dismissed by the trial court and the matter was adjudicated in favor of the plaintiff's decision and the trial court. The order passed by the appellate court was upheld. It was held by the authorities that the trial court could not proceed in the presence of a mediation clause. The trial court correctly dismissed the request that the authorities take action to take action under the meaning of section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, under section 34 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, under section 39 of the Act Had gone, and the authorities had not filed any appeal against the order, the High Court finding no place to interfere with the trial court's order dismissing the application for powers. Record trial results prohibit the trial court from reading any misunderstandings and evidence. No evidence was presented on record to support the trial court's dismissal, therefore, the agreement was set aside, The High Court amended the trial court's order and the amount of damages included by the trial court in the order was deducted, after which another appeal was allowed. famous high court advocate from Upper Dir lawyer