Sections 6, 7 and 23 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Articles 386, 387, 506 (2), 504 and 337H (2) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), 5 526 Terrorism Act, put an individual Applicants alleged in the FIR that they moved the matter regularly to court for fear of death, extortion, criminal intimidation and any aggravated harassment offense for speeding and negligence. The accused had demanded Bhutta two months ago, but no FIR was registered on the incident and other material collected during the investigation did not reveal that under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 No offense was committed before, therefore, the factors that cause terrorism, or the feeling of panic, to any person, or to any section of the people, are the provisions of section 6 (2) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 ) The extortion components were made, therefore, the Anti-Terrorism Court did not exclude the matter from fact. There was no jurisdiction for the trial, which was unlawfully terminated, and was not sustained under the law. The petition was allowed by the High Court to have jurisdiction over the case at trial. Let the case go to court.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
