Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAZIA versus INAMUDDIN

Arts & 78 and partnership 82 Proof of Contract Document Document Agreement To reduce certain terms and conditions of building renovation, the Registrar has no registered "partnership" to form a firm to conduct business Was. Provided, 1984, that if a document was alleged to have been signed or written in whole or in part by a person, the handwriting of the signature or so many documents in which the person's hand was Is alleged to have written. To prove that his handwriting was written in Conan martyrdom 82, 1984 1984 stip stipulated that if the witness testifying refused or accepted the document. Then his execution may be proved by other evidence. \ R \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• GHULAM SARWAR v. State 2013 YLR 1135
• Mst. TAHSEEN v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU 2013 PCrLJ 1137
• MEGA CURRENCY EXCHANGE COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. v. Senior MANAGER COMMERCIAL C.A.A. 2013 CLD 1144
• AIJAZ alias ABDUL SAMI 2 v. State 2013 MLD 1145
• BEHRAM KHAN v. State 2013 YLR 1147
• ARBELO v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1155
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN BUGTI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Senior Member, Board of Revenue 2013 CLC 1155
• MUSHTAQUE AHMED v. State 2013 YLR 1158

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

top civil advocates from Mansehra lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes