Section 302 (b) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Articles 103 and 164 of Qatil Ahmad Shake were defined as beneficial to the adviser in this case, while the co-adviser was designated as arrest counsel and recovery was not disclosed. Had happened Whether the "blank" used in the commission of the crime has been recovered, nothing was recorded on the site of the incident that the empty cartridge was recovered. No one was married and no weapons were found. The only investigating witness, Zemir, belonged to the complainant, whom the prosecutor declared to be the enemy. And no other resident in the area has witnessed the alleged weapons seizure and arrest of the suspect. And in this regard, no explanation has been made as to whether any attempt was made to persuade anyone from any area or to act as a witness to the public in this matter. Was done, although prosecution witnesses said that on the occasion of 20/25, the assailants openly violated the Article 103 clause, CCPI allegedly termed the recovery of the weapon extremely suspicious. In fact, in the confessional statement filed by the magistrate's magistrate statement, material weakness and errors were found which showed that he did not have. Under section 164 (()), the conditions required for recording the confessional statement were followed, contradictory statements of CCP prosecutor's witnesses were not guaranteed the culprit of the accused Medical examiner and postmortem Do not bring documents on record by the Medical Officer. General evidence was not reliable and did not prove circumstantial evidence
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013
