NOOR AHMAD TAJ versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, PAKPATTAN
Article 199 Constitutional Petition Civil Service Outstanding Salary Petitioners filed a constitutional petition seeking direction against the authorities for payment of salaried wages during their termination of employment, such application not in its previous constitution A request was made in which the petitioner was ordered to be restored, nor was the court requested to pass any order for this purpose, nor was there any order of restitution regarding the arrears of salary. The order was not kept, in the absence of a specific High Court order in this regard. The claim could be presented to the authorities for payment of salary claimed by the officer, the payment of salary, for the period when an employee / employee was away from the job, could only be worked when he was specially employed. Has been stated in the petitions and it has been proved by aggression. Evidence that during such period when such employee was out of service, he had not joined the service or was earned in any other way during that period, this question was a question of fact and constitutional jurisdiction In the process, it cannot be inserted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Upper Dir lawyer