Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZAM versus PIR BAHA-UD-DIN

O XLI, R 19 Appeal for prosecution The date of hearing of a lawyer deposed appeared in the proceedings, stating that the other lawyer's term has expired and he has no brief summary of the case and has received a brief dismissal. It was said that he did not know the history of the appeals while his lawyer had. Expired, his non-submission was neither intentional nor deliberate, and it was in the knowledge of the lawyer whose application was postponed. His name appeared in the cause list, but he did not appear. Consequently, the proceedings were dismissed without appearing, no credible reason was presented for the absence of a lawyer and it was also stated that Why was there such a big delay in filing an application? No credible explanation was given as to how the appellants learned to dismiss the appeal, accordingly the petition was dismissed. online advocate from Karore Lalisan lawyer