MST. SAMINA NAWAZ versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER OF POLICE STATION KUHNA KHANEWAL, DISTRICT KHANEWAL
Arts, 199, 10, 14 and 15 The petitioner for the release of the petitioner from the constitutional petitioner petitioned for the release of the petitioner on the basis that according to this inquiry, the court in its order issued this order Had sent him a scare. Praise be to Allah, concluding; and that after the petitioner has filed a lawsuit, the Muslim girl has the right to be freely examined, after the applicant is detained in the Darul Aman, against his will or There will be no benefit to the mere wish of his mother / defendant. Even if the decision of the family case between the parties is not pending, placing the applicant in Darul Aman would be a violation of his fundamental right to freedom and liberty, as the applicant of the Constitution has sui juris to be a Muslim girl. , 14 and 15, was an indispensable right to decide who and to whom to marry or who to live with. She could not live with her alleged husband, against whom she filed a lawsuit for the simplicity of the marriage, or granted the applicant with her defendant's mother against her will. She would be free to move wherever the High Court could, however, made it clear that the observations in the present judgment were completely temporary in nature, which would have no bearing on the final decision of the family case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
