IRFAN ALI BHAYO versus STATE
The issue of receipt of evidence was not stated in the FIR or in the recovery advice on the samples obtained from the recovered drugs. It cannot be assumed, in all cases, that all Four bars were present in the bars because all of these bars were not sampled, nor were they chemically tested; samples were received in the laboratory after a delay of eight days from the recovery of samples containing a sample parcel. Not sent under the letter, and neither the letter number nor the date of the despatch - to justify such a major error. There is no explanation available on the record for, the defendant's sentence cannot be sustained because the prosecutor's case was full of suspicion. Was to create a reasonable doubt in the case of the prosecution, serious doubts were raised in the prosecution case, the verdict of the accused was irrevocable and the sentence was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Shadiwal lawyer