Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEH LAKHO versus HAJI

Appeals against section 19, 20 (2), 25A & 29 (2) Agricultural Commodity Market Rules, 1940, 29, 30 and 52 Criminal Procedure (V of 1898), Section 417 of the Market Committee for Evil. Founded and built on, which is over. Under the notification issued under Section 25A of the Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1939, the function was deviated from its failure to pay the deputy director / competent officer respondents / accused based market fees, however Notwithstanding the issuance of notices to the competent officer thereby, the Field Officer was empowered to prosecute him in a legal court, exercising his powers available under section 20 (2) of the Agricultural Produce Market Act, 1939, According to the field officer, he lodged a direct complaint against the accused. Dismissed and acquitted by general judgment. All the defendants / defendants on the basis that the complaint was not made in this market by any person authorized by the Resolution of the Market Committee. Although the notification does not specify what is the function of the Market Committee through the designation of Section 29, Officer Subsection (2), which expressly states that the agricultural produce against any individual market Can be prosecuted for a crime punishable by the Act, 1939. By the person of the Market Committee's contract, but there was no contract that the designated officer had given to the appellant, which was not covered by section 20 (2) of the Agricultural Products Market Act, 1939. Direct complaints were filed by the field officer with no resolution. Release of the Market Committee how to become a advocate from Kotla lawyer