Find a Lawyer

SHER ZAMAN versus STATE

Article ?64 ????? Modern video recording of the alleged identification of the incident site by the accused, which leads to the recovery of the bones and other related material, was not produced before the trial court. It was considered as evidence. Or otherwise, for the purpose of examining all evidence presented by the prosecution in support of his case, the defense had the right to cross-examine the investigating officer and all incident counsel recorded by the video camera. And an exercise was discovered. The requirement to cross the trial court case must be remanded to the trial court, where further evidence may be requested from the prosecution as recorded by the video camera and the cassettes and the defendant conducting further cross-examination. Will be entitled to pray for. Remanded to the trial court for all purposes of the Investigation Officer and Mashers case regarding the evidence on the record female advocates from Gujrat lawyer