Find a Lawyer

QAISAR versus STATE

Sections 2302 (b) and 2) 2 (c) of the evidence were entered into by the defendant, the reduction of space, the time of the incident and the pistol used in the incident, which caused the tomb to be abruptly burned. Had claimed responsibility for the killing of the under-killed. The need to protect his wife's honor for the incident was not proven by the evidence that witnesses only saw the accused fleeing from the spot and did not see that the troop inside the room where the shooting took place. It was The police were informed after a delay of 5 1/2 hours in the 4am case when the police arrived at the scene after receiving information from some sources, the prosecution witnesses died why they did not tell the police about the incident. told. At a time when the police station was only 2 1/2 miles away, the possibility of the story being lost and fabricated by the prosecution was lost. Immediately after his arrest, the accused's version was the same as described under Section 342 before the trial court. When the CCP's wife appeared in the court as a defense witness, she supported the defense request and her statement was factually encouraged, refusing the prosecution case and relying on the defense plea. The court could be trusted. The suspect is punished simply because he fired two bullets at a dead quantum or injured could not possibly be disclosed in the golden scales when acted under intense and sudden provocations or only in favor of self-defense. The sentencing sentence of the accused did not justify the death of two firearm wounds on the grounds of the case. famous high court advocate from Tando Jam lawyer