Find a Lawyer

SAID RASOOL versus SHAMSHAD ALI

The specific performance of the agreement was that the plaintiffs' section 12 suit was that the defendants had agreed to sell the suit on the land. That the whole amount was paid after which the contract came into operation and the possession of the suit land was handed over to the plaintiff and the defendants refused to perform their part of the agreement, the plaintiff in his written statement that the defendants had entered into an agreement I refused to enter. In order to receive any money with or from the plaintiffs, the trial was also denied and the appellate court dismissed the trial simultaneously. Upon receipt in his presence, the courts below have very accurately observed that in the first instance, no evidence of the implementation of the documents by the defendants was in the meaning of the law or in fact. That there was no evidence recorded that the defendants read the documents, including an elderly and an "attendant" woman, who could not interfere with the court's finding of coordination, under the circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n attorney vs advocate vs counsel from FR Peshawar lawyer