Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ABDUL AZIZ versus ABDUL HAMEED


Plaintiff's case on the due date for evidence AXVII, Rr 2, 3 and O IX, R 8 neither appeared nor presented the evidence before the trial court dismissing the case under Order XVII, R 2. Rule 3 CPC accuracy record revealed that on the due date for recording the evidence, none of the parties' suit was available, in the circumstances only action could not be taken under Order XVII, Rule 2, CPC. And most of the case could have been excluded by the court for a non-prosecution order. There was no jurisdiction so put aside right away in the first appeal

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Sargodha lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.