Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM-UL-HASSAN versus STATE

Section 555A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 379, 452; 748 and 149 were filed to issue an order when the police filed their FIR and were investigated, but no Theft was not committed and the police had dispatched the al-magistrate for their approval, the petitioner's complaint was that the cancellation report was not approved by the al-maga magistrate, but he was referred to the applicant as The accused was summoned, despite the fact that he was not admitted and the cancellation report did not show him as an accused, Was also not approved the decree litigation applicants requested the senses. Pay attention to the facts and circumstances of the case cancellation report and in the FIR, it was shown that the applicant's name was not listed. The legal way for the magistrate to work was to inform the informant and some of his witnesses. The statement should be recorded and then ordered on this material. It was brought to the record that without a legal application for litigation, an order seeking the petitioner could not be approved by the magistrate. E-facts and conditions and orders attributed to the material on record, were declared illegal and illegal, and were set aside in the circumstances. famous supreme court advocate from Kotli lawyer