MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM versus STATE
There was sufficient material denied against Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 468 and 471 bail, accused, primary, fraudulent material available on record revealed that it could be safely disclosed. ? The accused was the one who initiated the fraud and the one who was the ultimate beneficiary of the same accused could not avail of the Supreme Court order under which a patwari in the irrigation department was guaranteed that no direct. No, there was evidence / material against linking it to the commission of any crime in connection with changes in the revenue record available
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Kotla Pathan lawyer
