Find a Lawyer

FAISAL RAZZAQ versus TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, KHAIRPUR TAMEWALI

3, 5, 11 and 25 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application In response to the advertisement of the auction of tax collection agreement for the transfer of immovable property, twelve persons reserve the price for participating in the auction. 2% submitted a tax settlement agreement for the transfer of real estate, but only four people participated in the bidding and of these four persons, the respondent was declared the highest bidder and The contract applicant, who did not participate in the bid, was given. The challenge bid given by constitutional applicants four months after the date of the auction by the applicant stated that the story of the delayed events is proof of seriousness and proof if there were no auctions or papers by the applicant. ? In this regard it was prepared in a hypothetical manner, then the applicant should be born on occasion with prompt action as it was a timely contract from time to time. For only 10 months, the applicant had to be extra careful and cautious and approach the High Court immediately and promptly after the auction, delaying the High Court's approach, could easily be assessed. That there was no fraud in reality. There was no breach in relation to the auction and finalization and bid was made to finalize in favor of the respondent, who, despite collecting 2% of the reserve price, contributed to the bid. Was not taken, no Lux Standi was found to challenge the constitutional petition, though it could be filed. Presence of alternative remedies for either party top advocates from Shadiwal lawyer