Find a Lawyer

MST. MEHTAB BIBI versus KALEY KHAN

Section 35 (2) Conan Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 129 (g) Case of pre-requisite filing case Prevention of proof of pre-emptor absence in the evidence box Impact Suit Land Registered Cell Deed Sold by The case was filed on 5-10 1987, but on 28 28 1988 the trial court and the appellate court earlier dismissed the umpire's case concurrently that the necessary arguments were not legally proven, in the cases filed during the holiday. In the Impression Act, 1991, under section 35 (2) of the Punjab Prefecture, it was sufficient that if the Importer had performed the search in the presence of two true witnesses, the affidavit in connection with the performance of the pre-emptor Talai E Ashid. To be excluded was to appear in court, the pre-emptor's special counsel's statement could not be believed. , When the pre-emptor himself was present and could give his own evidence, the importer was the best and material witness to Taleb's performance. There is no reason why the pre-emptor did not appear as his own witness in this case. Red, though he had gone to the seller's pre-emptor's house, had deliberately prevented himself from appearing in court, to avoid cross-questioning himself in front of him while recording evidence. Prevention of the best evidence was badly affected by the authenticity of the pre-emptor's version, before the Empire did not present a single independent witness to substantiate the performance of Tulb Ish Ashid, citing the performance of Talbot Ishid. There was no strong and independent evidence of reliable witnesses of a credible nature. Amendment jurisdiction denies coordination / review by courts property advocates from Chohar Jamali lawyer