MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF THROUGH L.RS.
Section 8 Case for possession of part of the joint building of its co-owner, because in a building the co-owner allowed the occupant of his common yard to occupy, rather than vacate the suit property on demand, illegal construction. The plaintiffs' and civil court's preliminary decisions to file such a settlement case against Lux Standady show that the suit property has, in fact, formed part of a common courtyard that allowed the building Mixed for joint use. Defendant did not request that he be present under the license. Regarding any other co-owner, only the plaintiff allowed the plaintiff to occupy part of the common compound of the common building, because the plaintiff was in unlawful possession of the property, the defendant was obliged to refuse the situation. \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Gujar Khan lawyer
