Find a Lawyer

MST. BHAGOO versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL

Article 42 & Documents Documents for canceling and canceling documents The plaintiff was the owner of the case who was the legal heir of the plaintiff's deceased brother, it is claimed that the plaintiff was executed in favor of her husband and Gave him the option to sell the property. And that the plaintiff's husband, allegedly executed and registered in connection with the plaintiff's estate in favor of his father, allegedly exercising the powers conferred on him by the Power of Attorney, was allegedly the brother of the plaintiff. As the lawyer declined to be released. The courts, in favor of her husband, below, gave this right to the plaintiff to claim that she could not produce any evidence or documentary evidence to substantiate her testimony. Through this document / power of attorney was executed and registered, moved to the defendants but failed to be denied. He said the alleged marginal witnesses said that the power of attorney was not examined by the accused and that no explanation was available on record. According to the witnesses, the courts did not consider such material aspects of the disputed orders of the case; in the circumstances there was a consequence of not reading the records, and in the jurisdiction of the courts, the material disappearances resulted from irregular orders. Was set aside and the case filed by the petitioner. Decree \ r \ n best advocate from Chak Jamal lawyer