PUNJAB COOPERATIVE BOARD FOR LIQUIDATION versus JOINT REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 16 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Applicant Applicant's request to withdraw from society held that the Cooperatives Judge had exclusive jurisdiction in relation to all matters relating to the question of dissolved societies, including the Respondent Society, which the Law Petitioner Is dissolved by the action of It is further stated that the orders passed by the authorities in the case of the respondents in this case relating to the respondents in relation to the responsibility of the property of the society are violative of the legal bar and without any jurisdiction to prosecute the matter. Have gone to the root, maybe Raised at any stage as it will affect the authenticity of the invalid proceedings No restriction will be imposed against the invalid order. The question of jurisdiction was not accepted in this matter by the forum below. need to. There was a beginning and a question that led to the law of limitation; by the use of falsehood, it would be affected by the disappearance and unlawful action that the untimely order predicted by the applicant on the basis of any limitation, It was declared without legal authority, in the first case the jurisdiction of the law would be determined. Workers under the Punjab Cooperative Society Act, 1925 to deal with any issues relating to property matters and societies that are inactive under the Act.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
