Find a Lawyer

MST. SHABNAM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE

7th XVIII, R2, Articles 12 (2) and 151 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for separation of the former party decree, for trial of possession by division of applicants for presentation of witnesses, After the previous parliament's order was passed, the applicant filed an application under section 12 (2), the CPC filed an application to keep the same applicant separate during the proceedings. X 2I, read with section 151 under R 2, the CPC has requested that the applicant be allowed to present two witnesses, and it is claimed that the right of each party to present evidence in the dispute That is, whenever new points were raised, Syed's plea was dismissed by the trial court and the review petition filed against such order was also dismissed, petitioner requested that both witnesses be applied. Was necessary to establish A XVHI did not engage in the justification of any R2 lawyer, the CPC stopped the evidence preparation, but did not make Coun's lawyer for the respondents in the displeasure case. It was correct to state that the burden of proving all the matters on the applicant, she could present all the testimony she wanted in the relevant time, but there was no convincing reason for the non-presentation of the witnesses. In the order of the appellate court, the constitutional petition referred to any illegal or illegal reading of the law in its context. advocate from Chunian lawyer