Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALIL versus SHABINA SHEHZADI

Sections 12d27 (b) of the Transfer of Property Act (IV 1882), section 41 law evidence (10 of 1984), arts 117 and 120 civil procedure code (v. 1908), section I00 specific to the contract to sell the sow feed buyer The performance entered the witness box to prove Ounce's shift without notice and was dismissed as he had no knowledge of the previous execution agreement in favor of the plaintiff, both courts simultaneously filed a lawsuit dismissing the plaintiff. And the appeal was dismissed when the burden of proof was given to the party, it was admitted to the witness box and it was dismissed that it had no knowledge of any fact. Of course, the burden of proof was on the other parliament so that they could not know about the previous contract to sell it. The plaintiff was moved to show that the plaintiff and the seller had knowledge of the default agreement and the plaintiff failed to exclude, with no evidence to show that claim. Before B was aware of the contract and was not a clear buyer without notice, the plaintiff also failed to prove that the defendant had the property of transfer, section 41 of 1882 and section 27 of the Special Relief Act, 1877 The matter was decided by the. The court below dismissed the second appeal against the plaintiff in the circumstances immigration advocate from Hangu lawyer