Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMAD versus STATE

No body has seen the testimony of Section 2 (2 (b)) evidence that the statement of one of the prosecution witnesses regarding the transplant of blood stains immediately after the killing of a victim by another witness He was not supported. The prosecution said that the culprit's weapon was recovered one day before the accused's remand was approved by the accused, as well as the two related to the recovery of arms. The witness was also a witness to the alleged conspiracy made by the accused in the murder of the deceased widow and the deceased, but only one witness In this connection, the prosecution was supported, but the presence of the witnesses at 3am was impossible for the house of the accused and not one person could be expected to commit such a loud plot to murder in an open space. That the passer could hear the conversation, on the sole statement of a witness, the conviction of the accused could not be proved on the basis of a criminal who was neither credible nor guilty, according to which he was acquitted. power of attorney advocate FR DI Khan lawyer