ATIF ALI SHAHZAD versus STATE
Section 497 (enforced Jewish) ordinance of adultery (V / L 1979), sections 10 (2) and 11 bail, the defendant's refusal to commit a felony with a minor girl whose parents complained of tuition Had engaged in The accused did not lose the confidence of the firefighter, but completely destroyed the life of a minor girl by committing an adulterous crime victim, and made the accused fully involved in this heinous crime under Section 161, By making statements under Mid-164, the CCPC4 delay / 5-day filing of FIRs in such cases was not fatal to the prosecution case because people were, naturally, the most First, they refrain from arriving at the police station. And usually try to recover their victim The crime against the accused falls under the prohibited clause of section 497, the PC suspect was fully involved in a vicious crime, which was not only a crime against the victim, but also society and Was against such people. Unable to grant bail in the exercise of discretionary powers under Section 7497, the CCP challan was also presented in court and fried for evidence in the case. The bail application was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Okara lawyer