Find a Lawyer

ASIM ALIAS KALOO versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, further investigations were granted overnight, and the murder, according to the FIR, was unknown, leaving both accused in any capacity. Was not nominated to the IR. , But he appeared for the first time in the case three days after the alleged incident, when he was charged by a complainant with a request made by the local police, even though the accused named in the FIR The complainant was presented to him by the accused as a co-offender, but there was no reason given by the complainant in the aforementioned plea that he had been involved in the alleged murder along with the designated co-accused NG Identification Parade. Was found to be involved so that eyewitnesses could be facilitated. Only a piece of evidence is available to identify the culprits who the alleged witnesses witnessed with their accompanying accused are the last evidence provided by the prosecution witnesses who was on record. Making his first statement to the Investigation Officer more than three months after the alleged incident against him, demanding further investigation of his crime, in the circumstances it was to be admitted as a bail and not right By grace or grace. The accused was released on bail, in which case: online advocate from Gilgit lawyer