Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAHID versus STATE

In its application under section 6A6A, 505050 and 1 561A for the custody / superdie of the petitioner, section 616161A, the CRPC sought the court's inquiry orders under which The Iris request for vehicle restitution was dropped from the vehicle. The question was neither stolen property nor involved in any criminal case. The only question was about the chassis number of the undercarriage vehicle, which was alleged to have been cut and welded, requiring further investigation; the applicant, the first person, happened to be the undercarriage vehicle. The neat buyer and the Excise Department had also moved the car in his name. No one else claimed to have gotten rid of the vehicle when it was meaningless to remain in the car indefinitely in police custody, but complete. Acceptance, damage and damage to a vehicle which could not be allowed under any provision of law Accordingly, the superintendent should be handed over to the applicant accordingly advocates from Besham lawyer