MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ ALIAS RIAZ versus STATE
Section 498 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) Pre-arrest Bail, the defendant's denial in the FLR charge against the accused was appropriately designated that he co-accused Together they committed adultery. The medical report with the victim said that the victim had been subjected to adultery, had earlier been found involved in such cases and was sentenced. The accused then committed the same crime, which was a hate crime. Was, Prima Fax, the accused was involved. The trial and trial were not established by the accused in the trial The grounds for the approval of pre-arrest bail were different from the arrest The offense against the accused falls under the Prohibited Clause of Section 497, There have been no pre-arrest bail cases. Made by the accused, he did not deserve any arbitrary relief from the High Court. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Hunza Nagar lawyer
