Find a Lawyer

LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus MST. AMINA DURRANI

Sections 2 (c), 3, 4 and 17 of the Civil Procedure Code {V 1908), O VII, R 2 The acquisition of property by the Authority under the West Punjab Disadvantaged Areas (Development) Ordinance for collection of compensation amount. Due to the absence of the same market value of vacant plots, the respondents were given two plots in lieu of the proportional share of the acquired property in 1948, the Authority has decided to place the respondents in terms of compensation. Will Respondents filed a lawsuit to recover $ 100 million worth / compensation. After scrutinizing the evidence, the judgment and market value of Rs. 40, 00,000 per Marla, according to the order of Rs. 4 crore, were approved by the Validity West Punjab Damaged Areas (Development) Ordinance 1948 and the Punjab Development of Dams Areas Act 1952. Was provided. A complete procedure for the acquisition of the land was not returned by the trial court on the issue, which confirmed whether the possession of the property obtained by the authority was ever occupied. Was denied by the trial court, which pronounced the verdict. The trial court awarded the compensation on the basis of the valuation table reported by the Deputy Commissioner for the purpose of recovering stamp duty under the Stamp Act for being unclean in the eyes of the law, the land market prices in dispute as acquisition for the year. No attempt was made to determine. Referring to the sale deeds in 1952, these sales functions did not present the quality of the evidence in the absence of evidence regarding the location and potential value of the ground subject. Decision-making and decree were set aside and the matter remanded to the trial court best advocate from Khushal Kot lawyer