Find a Lawyer

MST. AZRA PARVEEN versus MUHAMMAD YOUSAF

On the basis of such Power of Attorney on the basis of such Power of Attorney, the applicant was the wife and husband InterC and the respondent was one of the applicants on the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), sections 182 and 188. Was a brother of The power of attorney was executed in his favor and he exercised his powers under his authority, saying that the power of attorney executed a sale deed in respect of the property of the respondents in favor of the applicant / her husband. Said that the Power of Attorney filed a lawsuit against the executioners. The trial court rejected, but the appellate court upheld the trial court's decision and order, affirming the respondent's assertion, saying the witnesses were consistent and reliable, and the amount mentioned in the agreement was also compensated. There was a good check received by the defendant through his Hank account, the defendant also acknowledged receipt of the money in his testimony, saying that the circumstances were to prove the contract and the power of attorney by the respondents themselves. It was enough that the time for payment by check and concurrent agreement and the trial court's powers to prosecute He was rightly regarded as proving the defense by the applicants and bearing the case set by the appellant below the defendants did not deal with such aspects of the case nor did he argue the trial court's appeal. What was it Due to non-reading of the record, the order was set aside and the trial court order was restored. top advocates from Hala lawyer