ABDUL GHAFOOR versus STATE
Sections 2302 (b) and 4 324 of the evidence were immediately appreciated to the police that the matching of carbines recovered from the crime scene at the scene was close to each other, in the event of daylight. During the misfortune of the accused, the statements of the two eyewitnesses in question were irrelevant. The third eye witness who was injured during the incident also fully supported the prosecution case. There was nothing but an impossible and unnatural story to be made, which was neither proven by the prosecution's evidence on record Both the accused nor the victim killed by gunfire wounded by the prosecution and the witness was not available the situation was no less in favor.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Shahkot lawyer
