Find a Lawyer

AUTHORITY THROUGH DIRECTOR-GENERAL versus FAIZ MUHAMMAD KHAN

Section 42 and Su 55 for the plaintiff's prayer, and under this, he was to be declared as the legitimate owner of the suit plot, which the Development Authority had before the Authority Trial Court's decision to adjourn its application No one else has the option to allocate. Directs the authority to adjust the plaintiff in respect of a plot for development and payment of other charges, which was claimed by the appellate court in which similar relief claimants applied before the Development Authority. Was pending when it filed a lawsuit. It was to be decided now, whether or not the claimant was entitled to the adjustment, the plaintiff did not pray for the authority to adjust the suit plot, the assistance given to the plaintiff was beyond the request of the plaintiff, which could not be That is, the High Court rejected the unauthorized injunction for it. The effect is that the claimant was not entitled to adjustment in the plot owned by the Authority at that time. r \ n how to become a advocate from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer