MUHAMMAD NAWAZ ALIAS PAPPU versus STATE
Sections 302 (b), 324 and 34 of the evidence were appraised the next day of the post-mortem examination. The doctor explained that he received a post-mortem examination within 10-15 minutes after receiving the police papers. That would mean that the papers were presented with extraordinary delays, which promptly raised serious doubts about the FIR's entry, which also could not be ruled out. The prosecutor's story was time consuming, resulting in the late submission of police papers. Doctors did not even mention the names of the suspects in the FIR, which was listed on a written request submitted by the Camp Intent FIR. In the circumstances, evidence can be used as evidence that the mother of the deceased account. , Who appeared as a prosecution witness. , The incident was not witnessed and all the evidence was based on contempt of court was not sufficient to prove the evidence presented by the prosecution. The second witness of the prosecution had improved during the court proceedings for the involvement of the accused in the case, in fact it was not evidence, but the trial court had committed the content of the death sentence and the death sentence against the accused illegally. During the proceedings, when the court acquitted the four accomplices with the same character, the motive proved unproven Medical evidence was as comfortable, though it was hurt in the fire arm a complaint with the victim during the incident shows. Any way
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from FR Kohat lawyer