ALAM JAN ALIAS ILAM JAN versus STATE
Section 2 (b (b) / 34 34) Definition of evidence There was no unusual delay in conducting a post-mortem by a doctor and nothing was found in the record to prove that an FIR was not filed immediately. Both witnesses were associated with the deceased. If he spoke, he could be counted on as well. The fact and his evidence were confirmed by some independent pieces. After the incident, prosecution witnesses said that eight other accomplices who were acquitted were not charged with any death, and no one else was injured by the complainant. The accused had special injuries to the deceased and, according to the trial, his case was declared to the court as distinguished from the case of the acquittal accused. Was found. The incident took place in broad daylight at a place where other people were present and the incident could not be disclosed. The main suspect was an extraordinary case, suspicion was also sought in the defense's request, medical evidence fully supported his involvement, saying that the two suspects suffered fatal injuries. Weapons and evacuation motifs were unnecessary because it was said that the weapons and vacant documents were not sent to the Office of the Forensic Science Laboratory
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Sehwan lawyer