Find a Lawyer

MST. MARYAM BIBI versus NOOR AHMAD

Section G 42 Proof of Gift Title of motion statement = Limit was a co-participant in the suit with the joint plaintiff plaintiff and the defendant was turned over in gift custody in favor of the trial court even though it was found that the gift was made by the plaintiff. Was not given but the case was dropped. The trial and trial decision were set aside by the appellate court and the plaintiff was justified in favor of the plaintiff, with no evidence available gift The actual creation of the gift, which confirmed the change. And she appeared before the plaintiff's Revenue Officer when the gift was confirmed by the plaintiff's son and there is no reason why the defendant had all her land in the gift when she was the sister of her husband. Why shipped The plaintiff was the owner of the suit land and it was found that the gift was never made. The plaintiff was a co-partner of the plaintiff woman who did not reside in the village. Anne Dante was taking care of her land that the plaintiff had every inch The suit is considered a possession of land and at that time the High Court refused to interfere with the decision and the order passed by the appellate court was dismissed under circumstances \ r \ n immigration advocates email from Chak Jamal lawyer