Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus ABDUL GHAFOOR THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS

O XXVI, R 10 (3) High Court (Lahore) Rules, Volume 1, Part M (i) Report prepared by the local commissioner without measure, Accuracy The trial court granted the land to the deputy prosecutor. Appointed the local commissioner for Measles has revealed in the local commissioner's question report on the record that although the local commissioner has done some measurements on the spot, how and in what way it was said that the procedure / procedure was not lected. After that the revenue will be charged. The officers were advised by the administration that they were also included in the High Court (Lahore) Rules and the Order Revenue Officer was legally required to trace a permanent point such as a road, a canal. Well, or any other permanent structure from which it should be searched by measuring each number of measles and intervening at the point by which it was identified, the local commissioner also assumed that Measure by measuring the other side of the measles number. No such exercise was carried out, nor was it mentioned in the report. Even the local commissioner did not consult the revenue records, and a measles site outline in question was prepared by the relevant Patwari without measuring the site and the actions to be taken by the local commissioner should be. The report mentions but the report was located in a specific part of the measles, which was completely silent on the reasons for holding a suit shop, which was to be identified, unable to rely on such a report. Because it did not resolve the conflicts between the parties famous lower court advocate from Satyana Bangla lawyer