Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

A. XLI, R 31 In the appeal, the requirements of the plaintiff's trial were excluded from the trial by the trial court; the appellate court did not consider the plaintiff to rely on the testimony of the witnesses, while others on that point. The material evidence was neither assessed nor the outcome of their appeal discussed. O XLI, R 31, CPC, Appellate Court was required to determine the points to be heard and to decide on the reasons for the decision, which would indicate that the record reflects the statements of the witnesses and the defendant. The documentary evidence presented was not discussed in the appeal decision. The petitioners have requested that the copy of the registrant submitted by the defendant was not proved in accordance with the law. The probable decision disclosed that the document was relied upon without the objection of the plaintiff's objection. The appropriate determination or decision was made on the basis of the basis (s). b) and (c) as set forth in OXLI, R 31, the CPC was not excluded, the decision made was, therefore, not enforceable in law and the absence of proper jurisdiction as well as evidence Was not meant to be read so it was set aside. The first Appellate Court was directed by the High Court to hold a re-hearing of the parties and decide the case as per the requirements of the O. XLI. , R 31, CPC best law firm from Turbat lawyer