MAIRAJ versus STATE
The denial of both the defendants was permanently designated in the FIR, with the section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), sections 302, 148 and 149 guaranteed, and the role attributed to them was the result of serious injury to his chest. Was reached in which the injuries attributed to the accused were mentioned. In addition to the complainant's postmortem report complainant, other eyewitnesses also in their statements supported the case under CCPC 1616, the alibi accused taken by the accused during the investigation. Fully involved with the Investigation Officer. Placing the accused in Column 2 of the report under Police Secretary PC Api Dixit was not binding on the court, even while guaranteeing the ease of murder, the courts were generally reluctant to accept Albi's request. It should not go beyond that. Given the nature of the allegations in question, the direct role of the accused, their motive and complainant for six months after the incident and the fact that the witnesses steadfastly took to their version that the defendant's complexity, the trial warrant The request for bail was rejected, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Jalozai lawyer