MUHAMMAD ARSHAD ALIAS ACHHOO versus STATE
Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 324 Bail, Grant of Further Investigation The prosecution alleged that both attackers were equipped with firearms, but none of them repeated their firearms, though the complaint He was at his mercy. / The accused had ensured that they did not cause any significant damage to the body of the victim and was imprisoned till he was hit on the thigh and calf, which led to the motive of the killer. Had shown a lack of desire to become. The complainant will be charged with murder, it will be decided in the case. There was nothing in the record to prove that the accused was extraordinary, cruel or high-handed, that the defendants could not, and should not, be able to resolve the defects in the prosecution case. But neither is it indicative of the crime itself, nor is it sufficient that the accused was found guilty under section 497, sub-section (2) of the CRC, to be one of further inquiries. d On guarantee, in the circumstances \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Sangla Hill lawyer
