Find a Lawyer

MESSRS FOOD CONCEPT (PVT.) LTD, THROUGH DIRECTOR versus INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Section 132 (2) Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2005, R20 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Appeal, Date of hearing for non-prosecution Failure to note the next date; The appeal filed by the source was dismissed. The date on which the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal did not set forth by the petitioner was that the date on which the appeal was dismissed was not the date of the hearing and his counsel, having validated that date, had given that date. Was justified. Section 132 (2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, read with the IR20 (2) of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2005, may proceed, on the date fixed for the appeal to be dismissed. Is. The date of hearing of the wrongdoer's entry into the diary was declared a valid reason for the party's absence, the law passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was without legal authority, it had nothing to do with the legal Impressive and set aside, the High Court receives an appeal remand for a merit decision with the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal famous supreme court advocate from Chitral lawyer