MUHAMMAD BASHIR ALIAS BAKOLA versus STATE
The pre-arrest bail, section 420, 468 and 471 pre-arrest bail, Section 498 Criminal Procedure (1860 XLV of 1860) showed that the foreclosure in the interest of the accused persons was done by a registered cell deed to the complainant. The piece was sold to the complainant and the land was handed over to the complainant. Subsequently, a dispute arose between the shopkeeper / complainant and the Ivaky Trust Property Department, which ended after 26 years. The accused neither became a party to the proceedings nor did he produce any document alleging that he Has produced a fake registered sale deed which proves the removal of the disputed land. Because of his relative and the sale process, an accused filed a general power of attorney in favor of the defendant's relative's legal inheritance, filed a lawsuit for the declaration and forged a previous injunction. There is evidence that it has been alleged that it has nothing to do with the preparation of fake sale deals which have been implemented for more than 30 years by their predecessor. Charged with interest, did not appear to be directly involved in the preparation of the Sales Dead Case in these circumstances, to allow the accused to discount the pre-arrest bail. Appropriate, the ad's pre-arrest warrant was already approved,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Sidhnoti lawyer