Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus STATE


Sections 7 (b), 7 (h) and 7 (g) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 353 and 427 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the Incomplete Charge Frame Trial Court The charges were made under the provisions of sections 7 (b), 7 (h) and 7 (g) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 and section 13 of the Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, but PPC offenses, Sections 343, 353 and Under 427, the crimes committed by the accused were ignored. Under the Code mentioned in the Code of Conduct and the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, there were different offenses and different charges were to be imposed for the offenses, the trial court had made clear illegal proceedings in framing the incomplete charge. The trial court was remanded for trial in the new courts so the matter should be moved forward.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Upper Deval lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.