Find a Lawyer

BANK OF PUNJAB THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER versus TAJAMMAL HUSSAIN

Section 249A Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Rules 409/420/468/471/477 A / 109 Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Crimes Concerning Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance (IX of 1984), Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petitioner / Respondents filed petitions under Section 249A, CR PC, before the Judge, Special Court Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Praying for bad and federal government in matters prayed for withdrawal of case against accused, Judge Special Court decided in light of the contents of record of the accused's requests under Section 249A, CRPC Ray S, the accused / defendant was acquitted / filed a complaint / bank constitutional petition under the improper decision in which it was sought to declare that the said decision was without legal authority and illegal. Under the circumstances, appearing on the face of the record, the Judge Special Court, C, is not said to have acted without legal authority while concluding that the respondents / accused in the case before him. There is no possibility of being convicted; by examining the records of the proceedings before the special court, it was given the impression that the After the drawer and perhaps the change of government the tables changed and it appeared that everyone involved with the prosecutor, including the complainant / bank, was trying to convey that the accused / defendant was innocent. That in the present case, the prosecution / complainant and the accused / the respondent finally got the glove of the present constitutional petition and the request made by the applicant / bank also immigration advocates from Bahawalpur lawyer